OBAMA SUPPORTS COMPLETELY ILLEGAL ACTIVITY:
From My email:
In a March 2004 questionnaire, Obama was asked if the government should “crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants.” His reply? “OPPOSE.”
In June 2007, Obama voted AGAINST English as America’s Official Language — when 91% of American Citizens want English officially designated as our language.
In January of this year, in order to win Hispanic voters in California, Obama proclaimed his SUPPORT for granting driver’s licenses to illegal aliens.
This year, Obama voted AGAINST increased funding for border security, 700 miles of fencing, and placing 6,000 National Guardsmen on the border.
Also this year, Obama voted FOR the “DREAM” Act, which would allow illegal aliens to receive in-state tuition rates at public universities, discriminating against U.S. citizens from out of state and law-abiding foreign students.
In September of 2007, when asked if he would allow “sanctuary cities” to exist, which ignore the federal law & provide sanctuary to illegal aliens, he REFUSED to answer the question.
In March of this year, Obama voted YES on continuing federal funds for declared “sanctuary cities.”
In May of 2006, Obama voted YES to establish a “guest worker” program with a path to citizenship for ILLEGAL ALIENS.
Again in May of 2006, Obama voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
And, of course, Barack Obama voted YES on the McCain-Kennedy so-called “comprehensive immigration reform” AMNESTY bill.
This probably sums it up nicely: Obama was rated at just Eight Percent by the non-profit “U.S. Border Control” organization. Eight percent equals having an open-border stance.
8 Responses to “OBAMA SUPPORTS COMPLETELY ILLEGAL ACTIVITY:”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 9th, 2008 at 7:16 pm
From the US Border Control website:
“Our scorecard gives failing grades to ALL the Democratic candidates for President of the United States. Every one of them earned an âFâ, based on their recorded votes. The voting record in Congress for Governor Bill Richardson, admittedly, is dated to when he served in the U.S. Congress. But the fact that he earned straight zeros from us at that time, earns him a F grade on our Scoreboard. But, due to the age of the data, he also gets an asterisk because people can and do change, sometimes.
The Republican candidates are spread all over the spectrum, but the largest number of candidates is, again, in our F-rated column. These include Mike Huckabee, John McCain and Rudy Giuliani. While only Senator McCain has sufficient votes to earn his âFâ, the actions of Governor Huckabee and Mayor Guiliani are sufficient to warrant their grades.”
If you’re gonna post about how bad they think Obama is, shouldn’t you also post how bad they think McAint is? They don’t differ much when it comes to immigration. But at least Obama is consistent with his views. While I may not agree with him I can respect the fact that he hasn’t done the flip-flop like McAint has, and continues to do. He seems to change his position weekly.
June 9th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
McAin’t is pretty clever…did you make that up?
I wish we had stronger candidates.
June 9th, 2008 at 10:55 pm
The great master of consistency:
Obama today:
“It took [McCain] three different tries to figure it out, and in the end, his plan does nothing to help 1.5 million homeowners who are facing foreclosure, even as he supported spending billions to bail out Wall Street.”
Obama on the CBS Evening News in March of this year:
CBS: “Let’s talk about money. Bear Stearns has been helped out a lot by the Federal Reserve. Should the federal government be in the business of bailing out companies that were involved in the subprime mess?”
SEN. OBAMA: “Well, this was, I think, slightly different than a bailout. We had a situation here where a run on one of the investment banks on Wall Street could have created a domino effect that could have plunged this economy into a even more severe crisis than it’s already in. So I wasn’t privy to Bear Stearns’ balance sheets, but I think the idea that the Federal Reserve has to step in, in emergency situations, is something I wouldn’t challenge.”
June 9th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
I’m sorry but I’ve got to completely agree with FB and CD….there isn’t a single candidate that I can find on the ballot (including libertarian Ron Paul) that I am comfortable with and that I could vote for and feel “good” about. Hell…at this point I would settle for a candate that makes me feel mildly indifferent to them. And just wait…this election is just heating up…by the times it ends, it will look like an hourly edition of The National Enquirer. I can’t wait….
Maybe I’ll write in “Timmah” from Southpark….. heh heh…President Timmah…that makes me laugh.
June 10th, 2008 at 8:16 am
The email was about Obama. This is not a media site so there is not obligation to add to the email.
June 10th, 2008 at 8:17 am
As for me, I would vote for somebody who would mine the border and set up machine gun bunkers.
June 10th, 2008 at 9:35 am
Land mines are a bad idea, the last thing we need is the ghost of Princess Di showing up!
Double fence the boarder. a 2 ft. high one at the north bank of the Rio Grand with signs in 25 languages that say “anyone in the no man’s land will be shot on sight”. The second fence is 100′ back with an automated .50 cal machine gun mounted on a tower every 100 yards.
I’m not sure a group of unarmed Green Berets could navigate that!
June 10th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Houston - I don’t see a flip flop in that.
In his first statement he never said helping banks was a bad idea. He just said it was McAints only idea. Where’s the flip flop?
I’m sure Obama has some conflicting statements out there, but ya gotta do better that that.